Talk:Fliegerabwehrpanzer 68

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirected

I have redirected this to the Panzer 68 article after checking articles about other more famous tanks, including the Centurion tank and the M48 Patton. Other tank articles have a brief mention of their specialist variants and no separate articles for those variants. YSSYguy (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am against redirection because informations get lost.

Exampels that a redirection is not needet: B-707, the KC-135 Stratotanker, RC-135, the E-3 Sentry, the E-8 Joint STARS, all of them are based on the B-707. So it is right to listen them on the B-707 page. like all the differend versions of the B-707 like B707-220, 707-320B. But they have all also theyer own Page. I would go so far and say the differens (mission, equipment,..) between the KC-135 and the E-3 is like betwen the Panzer 68 and the Fliegerabwehrpanzer 68. I hope this helps you to understand why i had choosen this way and had not put all on the Panzer 68 page.

And here a "heavy" example: The Flakpanzer Gepard is based on the hull of the Leopard 1 (the Biber (Brückenlegepanzer),Bergepanzer 2 have one Pages on DE WP), also the just in prototypes build SP70Tankgun based on Leopard 1 (morde detailed on DE WP) or the ZSU-23-4 who is based on the GM chassis. The Panzerhaubitze 2000 is based on the Leopard 2 (you can finde one sub pages (not in english but in german and a other language) about the Bergepanzer Büffel [1], Kodiak (Panzer) [2],Panzerschnellbrücke 2 [3], Panzerschnellbrücke Leguan [4].

Bye the way you checked out the M48 Patton but... M67 Flame Thrower Tank, Magach. FFA P-16 (talk) 06:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fliegerabwehrpanzer 68. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130719085845/http://www.armeemuseum.ch/uploads/media/Dok_Panzer_68.pdf.pdf to http://www.armeemuseum.ch/uploads/media/Dok_Panzer_68.pdf.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]